Our Blog

DWM is committed to learning for its team, clients and friends. In this changing world, it’s extremely important to stay current in all areas impacting your financial future.

We encourage all of team members to “drill down” on current topics important to you and contribute to our weekly blogs.  Questions from our clients and their families are often featured in our blogs.  

Financial literacy for clients and their families is very important to us.  We generally hold an annual wealth management seminar for all of our clients.  We encourage regular, at least semi-annual, meetings in person with our clients to review family updates, progress on financial goals, asset allocation and performance of investments.  We’re happy to assist younger members of the family as part of our total wealth management program.

Here’s our latest blog:

 

Print
PDF

DAFs, QCDs, Roths and 2019 Tax Planning-2020 is Coming

Written by Les Detterbeck.

2020 Tax Planning Coming

Hope everyone had a great Halloween. Now, it’s time to finish your 2019 Tax Planning. You know the drill. You can’t extend December 31st- it’s the last day to get major tax planning resolved and implemented. This year we will focus on three key areas; Donor Advised Funds, Qualified Charitable Distributions and Roth accounts. And, then finish with some overall points to remember.

Donor Advised Funds (“DAFs”). For charitable gifts, this simple, tax-smart investment solution has become a real favorite, particularly starting in 2018. The concept of DAFs is that taxpayers can contribute to an investment account now and get a current deduction yet determine in the future where and when the money will go.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 increased the standard deduction (up to $24,400 in 2019 for married couples). Couples with itemized deductions less than the standard deduction receive no tax benefit from their contributions. However, they could get a benefit by “bunching” their contributions using a DAF.   For example, if a couple made annual charitable contributions of $10,000 per year, they could contribute $40,000 to the DAF in 2019, e.g., and certainly, in that case, their itemized deductions would exceed the standard. The $40,000 would be used as their charity funding source over the next four years. In this manner, they would receive the full $40,000 tax deduction in 2019 for the contribution to the account, though they will not receive a deduction in the years after for the donations made from this account.

Now, what’s really great about a DAF is that if long-term appreciated securities are contributed to the DAF, you won’t have to pay capital gains taxes on them and the full fair market value (not cost) qualifies as an itemized deduction, up to 30% of your AGI. Why use after tax dollars for charity, when you can use appreciated securities?

Within the DAF, your fund grows tax-free. You or your wealth manager can manage the funds. The funds are not part of your estate. However, you advise your custodian, such as Schwab, the timing and amounts of the charitable donations. In general, your recommendations as donor will be accepted unless the payment is being made to fulfill an existing pledge or in a circumstance where you would receive benefit or value from the charity, such as a dinner, greens fees, etc.

Many taxpayers are using the DAF as part of their long-term charitable giving and estate planning strategy. They annually transfer long-term appreciated securities to a DAF, get a nice tax deduction, allow the funds to grow (unlike Foundations which have a 5% minimum distribution, there are no minimum distributions for DAFs) and then before or after their passing, the charities they support receive the benefits.

Qualified Charitable Distributions (“QCDs”). A QCD is a direct transfer of funds from your IRA to a qualified charity. These payments count towards satisfying your required minimum distribution (“RMD”) for the year. You must be 70 ½ years or older, you can give up to $100,000 (regardless of the RMD required) and the funds must come out of your IRA by December 31. You don’t get a tax deduction, but you make charitable contributions with pre-tax dollars. Each dollar in QCDs reduces the taxable portion of your RMD, up to your full RMD amount.

For taxpayers 70 ½ or older, their annual charitable contributions generally should be QCDs and if their gifting exceeds their RMDs, they can either do QCDs up to $100,000 annually or, instead of QCDs,fund a DAF with long-term appreciated securities and bunch the contributions to maximize the tax deduction.

Roth Accounts. A Roth IRA is a tax-advantaged, retirement savings account that allows you to withdraw your savings tax-free. Roth IRAs are funded with after-tax dollars. They grow tax-free and distributions of both principal and interest are tax-free. Roth IRAs do not have RMD requirements that traditional pre-tax IRAs have. They can be stretched by spouses and beneficiaries without tax. They are the best type of account that a beneficiary could receive upon your passing.

A taxpayer can convert an IRA to a Roth account anytime, regardless of age or income level- the IRS is happy to get your money. A Roth conversion is especially appealing if you expect to be in a higher marginal tax bracket in retirement. Conversions make sense when taxable income is low or negative. In addition, some couples interested in Roth conversions make DAFs in the same year to keep their taxes where they would have been without the conversion or the DAF.

2020 is coming. You still have almost two months to resolve your 2019 tax planning and get it implemented. Make sure you and your CPA review your situation before year-end to make sure you understand your likely tax status and review possible strategies that could help you. At DWM, we don’t prepare tax returns. However, we do prepare projections for our clients based on our experience and knowledge to help them identify key elements and potential strategies to reduce surprises and save taxes. Time is running out on 2019. Don’t forget to do your year-end tax planning. And, of course, contact us if you have any questions.

 

https://dwmgmt.com/

 

Print
PDF

Old Adages Die Hard: What Worked in the Past May Not Work Today!

Written by Les Detterbeck.

adages.jpg

 

More people are renting (not buying) houses, particularly millennials. The old adage that “paying rent is foolish, own your house as soon as you can” is no longer being universally followed.  Lots of reasons: cost of college education, student debt, relative cost of houses, flat wages, more flexibility and others.  Today we 327 million Americans live in 124 million households, of which 64% (or 79 million) are owner-occupied and 36% (or 45 million) are renter-occupied. In 2008, homeownership hit 69% and has been declining ever since.

It starts with the increasing cost of college.  Back in the mid 1960s, in-state tuition, fees, room and board for one year at the University of Illinois was $1,100.  Annual Inflation from 1965 to now has been 4.4% meaning $1,100 would have increased 10 times to $11,000 in current dollars.  Yet, today’s in-state tuition, room & board at Champaign is $31,000, a 28 times (or 7.9% average annual) increase.  Yes, students often get scholarships and don’t pay full price, but even a $22,000 price tag would represent a 20 times increase.

It’s no surprise that in the last 20 years, many students following the old adage “get a college education at any price” found it necessary to incur debt to complete college.  Today over 44 million students and/or their parents owe $1.6 trillion in student debt.  Among the class of 2018, 69% took out student loans with the average debt being $37,000, up $20,000 each since 2005.  And here is the sad part: according to the NY Fed Reserve, 4 in 10 recent college graduates are in jobs that don’t require degrees.  Ouch. In today’s changing economy, taking on “good debt” to get a degree doesn’t work for everyone, like it did 50 years ago.

At the same time, houses in many communities have increased in value greater than general inflation.  Elise and I bought our first house in Arlington Heights, IL in 1970 when we were 22.   It was 1,300 sq. ft., 3 bedrooms and one bath and cost $21,000.  I was making $13,000 a year as a starting CPA and Elise made $8,000 teaching.  Today that same house is shown on Zillow at $315,000.  That’s a 15 times increase in 50 years. At the same time, the first year salary for a CPA in public accounting is now, according to Robert Half, about $50,000-$60,000. Let’s use $60,000.  That’s less than a 5x increase.  Houses, on the other hand, have increased at 5.6% per year. CPA salaries have increased 3.1%.  The cost of living in that 50 years went up 3.8%. Wages, even in good occupations, have lagged inflation. Our house 50 years ago represented about one times our annual income.  Today the average home is over 4 times the owners’ income.  That makes housing a huge cost of the family budget.

In addition, today it is so much more difficult to assemble the down payment. We needed 20% or $4,200; which came from $3,500 savings we accumulated during our first year working full-time and a $700 gift from my mother. A “starter” house today can cost $250,000 or more.  20% is $50,000, which for many is more than their first year gross income.  And, from that income, they have taxes, rent, food and other expenses and, in many cases, student debt, to pay before they have money for savings. Saving 10% is great, 20% is phenomenal.  But even at 20%, that’s only $10,000 per year and they would need five years to get to $50,000.  No surprise that it is estimated the 2/3 of millennials would require at least 2 decades to accumulate a 20% down payment.

Certainly, houses can become wealth builders because of the leverage of the mortgage.  If your $250,000 house appreciates 2% a year, that is a 10% or $5,000 increase on your theoretical $50,000 down payment. But what happens when real estate markets go down as they did after the 2008 financial crisis?  The loss is increased.  Many young people saw siblings or parents suffer a big downturn in equity 10 years ago and are not ready to jump in.

Furthermore, young people who can scrape up the down payment and recognize the long term benefits of home ownership, may not be willing to commit to one house or one location for six to seven years.  With closing costs and commissions, buying, owning and selling a house in too short a period can be costly and not produce positive returns.

Lastly, many people want flexibility and don’t want to be tied to a house. They want flexibility to change locations and jobs.  They want flexibility with their time and don’t want to spend their weekends mowing the grass or perform continual repairs on the house. In changing states like Illinois, with a shrinking population and less likelihood of significant appreciation, their house can be a burden.  For them, renting provides them flexibility and peace of mind.

It’s no surprise then that the WSJ reported last week that a record number of families earning $100,000 a year or more are renting.  In 2019, 19% of households with six-figure income rented their house, up from 12% in 2006.  Rentals are not only apartment buildings around city centers, but also single-family houses.  The big home-rental companies are betting that high earners will continue renting.

Yes, the world has changed greatly in the last 50 years and it will keep changing.  When I look back, I realize we baby boomers had it awfully good.  The old adages worked for us. But today, buying a house is not the “slam dunk” decision we had years ago, nor is a college degree.  The personal financial playbook followed by past generations doesn’t add up for many people these days.  It’s time for a new plan customized for new generations and that’s exactly what we do at DWM.

Print
PDF

Equity Trades are Free- But there is no Free Lunch

Written by Les Detterbeck.

Broker price wars

Before 1975, brokers had it really good. Commissions were fixed and regulated-at very high levels. It would sometimes cost hundreds of dollars to buy 500 shares of a blue-chip stock. That changed in 1975 when the SEC opened commissions to market competition.   A young Chuck Schwab and others became discount brokers- often charging ½ or less of the old rates. Since then, fees have continued to fall and earlier this year, trades could be made for $5 or less. Now, Charles Schwab & Co. as well as TD Ameritrade, E*TRADE and others have cut stock and ETF trades to zero. Free trading of equities has arrived.   Please be advised, though, that there is no free lunch- brokers profit from you even if they don’t charge for equity trades.

Here are some the main sources of income for brokerage firms:

  • Trade commissions
  • Brokerage fee- to hold the account
  • Mutual fund transaction fee-charges when you buy or sell a fund
  • Operating Expense Ratio-an annual fee charged by mutual funds, index funds and exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”)
  • Sales load- A sales charge or commission on some mutual funds paid to the broker or salesperson who sold the fund
  • Uninvested cash- brokers become bankers and lend it out

Let’s focus first on uninvested cash. In 2018, 57% of Schwab’s income came from loaning out its customers’ cash. As is typical in the brokerage business, uninvested cash is swept to an interest bearing account. However, sweep accounts typically earn almost nothing- usually ½ to ¼ of 1% or lower to the investor.

Schwab had a total of $3.7 trillion of deposits, with about 7% of it ($265 billion) in cash earning nice returns for them. Assuming a return of 2.5 % on the uninvested cash, that’s a return of $6.6 billion. The cost of that money was likely ½% or about $1 billion, with Schwab netting about 2%. $5.7 billion of Schwab’s $10 billion net revenue in 2018 was earned on its customers’ cash. Virtually all the brokers use the same model with uninvested cash.

Robo- advisors generally use the same format. Virtually all of them charge lower fees but require a certain amount of cash, between 4% and 30% in their pre-set asset allocations. Yes, there is a small sweep account interest paid on those funds, but not much. And, this is all typically disclosed. The rate paid on clients’ cash “may be higher or lower than on comparable deposit accounts at other banks” is a typical warning.

The use of uninvested cash is income for the brokers and reduction in performance for the investors. Let’s say your portfolio has 10% cash generating a 0% return. If your annual return on the invested 90% in your portfolio is 6%, then the return on 100% of the account is only 5.4%. A huge difference over time. As an example, the difference between earning 5% per year versus 6% a year on $100,000 for 30 years is $142,000.

Now, let’s look at the operating expense ratio (OER). OERs are charged by mutual funds, index funds and ETFs. If a fund has an expense ratio of 1%, that means you pay $1 annually for each $100 invested. If your portfolio was up 6% for the year, but you paid 1% in operating expenses, your return is actually only 5%. The OER is designed to cover operating costs including management and administration.

The first mutual funds were actively traded, meaning that the portfolio manager tried to beat the market by picking and choosing investments. Operating expenses for actively managed funds include research, marketing and significant administration with OERs often at 1% or more. Index funds are considered passive. The manager of an index fund tries to mimic the return of a given benchmark, e.g. the S&P 500 Index. Index funds should have significantly lower operating expense ratios. Evidence shows that actively managed funds, as a whole, don’t beat the indices. In fact, as a group, they underperform by the amount of their OER.

Operating expense ratios, primarily because of increased use of index funds and ETFs to minimize costs, have been getting smaller and smaller. In fact, we have seen some funds at a zero operating expense ratio. However, for these funds, a substantial amount (10% to 20%) of cash is maintained in the fund.

Conclusion: Set a target of 1-2% cash in your portfolio. Stay invested for the long term.   In addition, the investments in your portfolio should have very low OERs, wherever possible. However, in selecting investments, you need to look at both the OERs and the typical cash position of the mutual fund, index or ETF. Even if the OER is zero and the security holds 10% in cash, your performance on that holding will likely only be 90% of the benchmark, at best. Remember, when equity trades are free, brokers will continue to look for ways to make money, often at your expense.

Let's Get Acquainted

We offer a complimentary "Get Acquainted" meeting to describe our services, and to see if our services are right for you.

Contact Us