There are plenty of reasons for caution. So far, the rise that started in the stock market in March 2009 has lasted 56 months and produced gains of 166%. Margin debt has risen to record levels, investor sentiment is quite upbeat (55% bullish and only 16% bearish) which often foretells a correction, and warnings are coming from the likes of Warren Buffet and Carl Icahn.
Let’s put this in perspective. The S&P 500 is valued at 16 times projected 2013 earnings and 15 times estimated 2014 earnings. According to Barron’s report on Saturday, those price/earnings (P/E) ratios are about equal to the long-term average. Equities are currently trading at 2.5x book value- far below the peaks of prior bubbles. P/E ratios were 23, 30, and 17.5 before the bubbles popped in 1987, 2000 and 2007.
Perhaps a better measure for valuation other than P/E is CAPE. CAPE or cyclically-adjusted-price-earnings ratio is the brainchild of recent Nobel Prize winner Robert Shiller. Instead of focusing on one year of earnings, it averages the past 10 years, and adjusts them for inflation using CPI. Inflation is a powerful force that is often ignored when looking at nominal all-time highs. Dr. Shiller used CAPE valuation in his book “Irrational Exuberance” published in March 2000 which demonstrated how markets were overvalued during the internet boom. The dotcom bubble burst the same month.
Today, CAPE is at 24. The long-term average is 16. Dr. Shiller cautions against using CAPE to time crashes and make short-term trades. Rather, CAPE is more useful in predicting longer-term returns. Looking at stocks today, Dr. Shiller recently said: “The market is somewhat high, but it’s not a time when I would be writing ‘Irrational Exuberance’”. He continued: “Stocks are merely expensive, rather than bubbly.”
What Dr. Shiller does say, though, is that high CAPE historically produces lower returns in the following three years than years following low CAPE amounts. That’s understandable- it’s the old “reversion to the mean”. Good to reflect upon after such a banner year in stocks in 2013.
Perhaps a better question to ask, other than “Are we in a bubble,” is “Am I comfortable with how my portfolio would perform if there is a significant correction in stocks?” As we pointed out in our seminars last month, it’s all about stress testing your financial plan and your portfolio and focusing on what you can control.
Let’s say you have a balanced risk profile and have an asset allocation of 50% stocks, 25% fixed income and 25% alternatives. If there is a 15% stock market correction, what will be the likely short-term impact on your portfolio? Based upon what happened in 2008, the impact might be a decline of 5%-10%. Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future results. Can you live with such a decline? The answer should be yes for someone with a balanced risk profile.
We can’t tell you whether we are in a bubble or not. We do watch the markets very carefully but we can’t control them. What we focus on is making sure every client’s asset allocation is consistent with their risk profile. We also focus on the components within each asset class, rebalancing the investments on a systematic basis in an effort to produce enhanced performance. That’s the way we protect and grow our clients’ net worth and legacy and give them peace of mind.