DWM 2015 Year-end Market Commentary

Uncertainty imageIf you had to summarize the markets in 2015 with one word, it would be “uncertainty”. Much of the reason for the poor performance of stocks, fixed income, and alternatives can be chalked up to uncertainty…uncertainty of what the Fed was going to do with interest rates, uncertainty to when oil supply and demand will come into balance, and uncertainty surrounding China’s economy. In last quarter’s market commentary, we wrote about having just finished an awful August/September stock market drubbing, only to see equity benchmarks almost fully recover in October. Unfortunately, the good vibes didn’t last long as another sell-off commenced in December after the Fed raised interest rates for the first time in over nine years. The end result: 2015 going down as the first losing year since 2008 for many investors.

Here’s how the major asset classes fared in 2015:

Equities: The MSCI AC World Equity Index registered -2.4%. Emerging markets really took it on the chin, losing 14.9%, as represented by the MSCI Emerging Markets Index as falling commodity prices and the strengthening US dollar hurt these countries’ economies. On paper, the big cap US market benchmarks appeared to do better with the S&P500 only down 0.7% before reinvested dividends, but that is skewed by the outperformance of some of the largest capitalized names like Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, and Alphabet (formerly Google). Remove those names and the S&P500 would have similar figures to the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index (-4.4%) or the Russell Mid Cap (-2.4%).

Fixed Income: Fixed income investors aren’t jumping for joy at this year’s end. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index was up just a tiny bit, +0.6%; but the Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index declined 3.2%. It was worse off in the high yield aka “junk” market which finished the year -4.5%. This index was weighed down by energy companies where long term solvency has come into question given these extremely low oil prices.

Alternatives: In theory, asset allocation using a diversified approach helps investors over the long run. This was a very untypical year in that the three major asset classes (equities, fixed income, and alternatives) finished the year with very similar small negative results, with the Credit Suisse Liquid Alternative Index down -1.0% for the year. We wouldn’t expect that trend to continue for 2016. For more detailed info on alternatives, please see our blog from last month at http://www.dwmgmt.com/why-alts/ .

At the time of this writing, the stock market is not off to a good start in 2016, with the Dow tumbling more than 1000 points in the first week, as the uncertainty of the Fed, China, and oil continues. But let’s chat about those three items.

  1. The Fed and interest rates: The Fed has indicated that it wants to keep raising, but at a very gradual rate. The last thing they want to do is harm the economy or US or global growth. In fact, Fed officials expect that rates will still be below 3.5% in late 2018. So this is not the same thing as slamming down on the brakes when going 80mph.
  2. China’s slow-down: This is not a one-time 2015/2016 event. China is undergoing a necessary and positive adjustment, shifting from an economy based on heavy manufacturing towards one based on service. This will take years to convert so investors should simply expect these type of headlines and not fear them.
  3. Oil prices: Consumers are loving these lower prices at the gas pump, but it’s creating havoc in the global markets. There’s a disequilibrium: demand is up, but supply is up more, way more! Many energy companies are suffering. Imagine if your paycheck got cut in half or more. It’s very hard to live on severely reduced income. You still have the same fixed costs. So what do you do? You can borrow money and hope for prices to recover, but they may not and you may go bankrupt. This ballgame is only in the middle innings and could get uglier. Fortunately, for the US consumer, these lower oil prices means extra money in our pocket which most likely leads to spending and boosting our economy even more.

2016 isn’t another 2008 in the making. Major market declines typically occur when the economy is heading south. That’s not the case as the US economy is one of the world’s healthiest right now: there’s strong job growth, solid inflation-adjusted wage growth, and cheap gas prices. For diversified investors, there are opportunities in areas where selling has been overdone and market cycles start to reverse. It’s been a rough start in 2016, but a long-term investor remembers to stay the course, be disciplined, and be rewarded in the end.

Uncertainty is the one thing that is certain about financial markets.  Expect it, but don’t fear it.

Brett M. Detterbeck, CFA, CFP®

DETTERBECK WEALTH MANAGEMENT

Ask DWM: What Does the Fed’s Decision Last Week Mean?

FED logoThat’s a very important and good question.

Last week the Federal Reserve decided to hold rates steady. The uncertainty as to when they will raise rates has been extended to at least October and, if not then, to December or beyond. A Fed rate hike has been in the air since March when the Fed removed the word “patient” from its press release, signaling it could increase rates for the first time in nine years. Rates were reduced to zero in 2008 during the financial crisis and haven’t moved since.

This uncertainty has made markets very skittish. After a January and February when all asset classes were up, March through July was flat overall. Since the week after July 4th, the S&P 500 has alternated between weekly declines and gains for 11 consecutive weeks. China’s devaluation of the yuan in August (see the DWM blog) and the related concerns about its growth and that of emerging markets, caused a 6-7% pullback in stocks in August.

As we have pointed out previously, investors hate uncertainty. It’s interesting though. History shows us that equities typically do well during the tightening cycle (raising of rates by the Fed) and a year after the initial rate rise. (This is based on results in seven different time periods from 1983 to 2004). Hence, the uncertainty may be more disruptive to the markets than the actual tightening (raising of rates).

It’s valuable to look at the Fed’s decision and related statements in greater detail. They did acknowledge the U.S. economy is expanding at a “moderate pace” with “solid job gains and declining unemployment.” There is concern, however, about global growth. China, which has been growing at double digits, is now expected to be 6.8%. And other emerging market countries are struggling, particularly those whose income comes from oil and commodities. A decade ago, China accounted for 9% of the world GDP, now it’s 16%. Emerging markets overall now account for 57% of world GDP, up from 46% in 2004. We’re all interconnected, so lower worldwide economic growth impacts business earnings and stock valuations.

The other key factor is that inflation has failed to reach the 2% Fed target the last three years. Furthermore, the Fed doesn’t expect it to get there until 2018. What the Fed is trying to do is gradually raise rates at just the right time(s) before inflation hits 2% such that there will be a nice “soft landing” near 2% without the economy heating up and pushing inflation up too much and too quickly. At the same time, if the Fed raises rates too quickly and causes the economy to cool down, inflation could decline or even move to deflation, which we want to avoid.

Based upon the statements from the Fed officials last week and other recent data, it appears likely we may have lower worldwide economic growth and low inflation for at least a few years. Plus we will need to continue to endure the uncertainty of when the Fed will raise rates. October? December? Next year? What does all of this likely mean for investment returns?

First, nominal investment returns are likely continue to be lower than historical values. Historically, since 1970, stocks have grown at an annual rate of almost 9% while inflation has been a little more than 4% per year. Hence, there has been a 5% real return earned by risking money and investing in stocks. For the same time period, bonds returned 6%, or a 2% real return.

Mathematically, therefore, if inflation is 2%, it is very likely that a diversified all-equity portfolio might earn 7% and returns on a diversified bond portfolio might be 4%. And, if economic growth is low or stagnant, that pushes valuations down and lowers returns as well.

Nominal returns for all of us are under pressure from three sources; low inflation, slowing global growth and Fed uncertainty. We can’t control any of those. What we need to do is focus on real returns, not nominal returns. And, we need to make sure our financial planning and investment return expectations for the next few years are based on lower inflation and lower nominal returns.

We’re happy to chat about this important topic at any time. Give us a call.

Fed_lady_cartoon

REMINDER: Markets Don’t Go Straight Up!

Most equity markets were down 3% today, and most equity are markets down 5% this week! It’s the worst week for the Dow since 2011! The Dow is now in correction territory. What’s going on???

It’s been an unusual year. January and February were quite good. But not much has happened since then until this week’s market sell-off.

China’s apparent slow-down seems to be the main catalyst to what triggered this week’s ugliness, but we continue to have the uncertainty as to when the Fed will raise rates, if/when Greece will leave the Euro, and mixed second quarter earnings reports and economic news.

It is times like these that investors need to remember that markets don’t just go straight up. Markets don’t work that way- they go up and down! Not every calendar year can be an “up” year. As a long-term investor, you not only stay invested, but even may see this as an opportunity to buy more.

There have been over a dozen market pullbacks of 5% or more since March 2009. This is another one! Generally, when the market comes back, it does so quickly. So, it’s a fool’s game to try to time the market and jump in and out of it. No one has a crystal ball. Furthermore, we know that over time that staying invested is your friend. Studies show that just missing a few days of strong returns (which we could very well get next week or later this month), can drastically impact overall performance.

The market constantly over-reacts and then reverts back to the mean. Do not get caught up in emotion and sell and buy at the worst times. Unfortunately, humans are not wired for disciplined investing and usually trade poorly based on fear. They wind up selling at the lower prices (on fear) and buying at the higher prices (on elation) per the graph below.

Emotions

I’m sure many readers are nervous after this latest week with all this uncertainty in the air. However, if you use a wealth manager, like DWM, we can help you focus on what can be controlled:

  • Create an investment plan to fit your needs and risk tolerance
  • Identify an appropriate asset allocation target mix
  • Structure a well-balanced, diversified portfolio
  • Reduce expenses through low turnover and via passive investments where available
  • Minimize taxes by using asset location, tax loss harvesting, etc.
  • Rebalance on a regular basis, taking advantage of market over-reactions by buying at low points of the market cycle and selling at high points
  • Stay Invested

In closing, a pullback / correction like this one might actually be a very healthy thing because it may signify that the underlying assets’ valuation is getting back in line with fundamentals. So don’t get anxious over this latest short-term market volatility. By all means, there is a lot of “noise” this month. We’ve seen “noise” before and we’ll see “noise” again. Instead, remember that, over the long-term, the markets have rewarded discipline, through world events of all types. Check out the graph below, put your mind at ease, and have a great weekend. Let us deal with the “noise” and give us a call if you’re still feeling anxious next week.

Markets Have Rewarded Discipline

Ask DWM: How Does the Likely Fed Rate Hike Impact Your Asset Allocation and Investments?

janet-yellen

Investors and markets are watching this week’s Fed meeting very carefully. Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen and Fed officials appear to be moving toward raising short-term interest rates this year. Most expect September will mark the time of the Fed’s first rate increase since 2006. A key challenge for the Fed will be the communication of where future rates are going.

We all remember two years ago when Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke created a “taper tantrum” (and threw all markets in chaos for one month) when he signaled it was thinking about ending the QE program. Chairwoman Yellen wants to avoid that and has recently been emphatic that she expects rate increases to be slow and gradual once they start. In fact, in a March speech in San Francisco, she used the term “gradual” or “gradually” 14 times.

The U.S. economy is making progress, with strong job gains and rising wages. Auto sales are way up and factory machines are humming. Small business and consumer sentiment is up as are retail sales. The Producer Price Index rose slightly higher than expected. This data is likely too strong for investors or the Fed to ignore. So, yes, it looks like a rate hike will likely occur this year.

Of course, none of us can control when the Fed will raise rates, what rates will be longer term and how well the Fed communicates the future. We can, on the other hand, control our asset allocations and our investments. That’s where our focus should be.

Let’s revisit our annual DWM seminar in October 2013 entitled “Rising Interest Rates: Should I Be Concerned?” Here’s a quick summary of the key points that are still valid today.

  • The bond bull market may be over.
  • Bonds still play a vital role within an overall portfolio as do all of the asset classes.
  • Equities typically perform well in rising interest rate environments, with the “sweet spot” being when the 10 Year Treasury Bond rates are between 3% and 4%.
  • Use of multiple asset classes lead to non-correlation effects that ultimately lead to better long-term results.
  • One needs at least 15% in alternatives to make a difference.
  • Stay invested.

So, focusing on asset allocation, you should start by revisiting your risk profile. This includes risk capacity, risk tolerance and risk perception. Your risk profile is unique. You need to look at your long-term financial goals and plan and honestly assess how you are “wired.” It’s not as simple as looking at your age. We work with clients in their 80s who have an aggressive risk profile and clients in their 30s who have a conservative risk profile. Your risk profile will determine your asset allocation and therefore your portfolio mix of equities, fixed income and alternatives. In the long-term, your asset allocation is the primary (90%) determinant of the return of your portfolio.

2013 was a watershed year for fixed income. For three decades, fixed income had always been an asset class with low risk and good returns. The “taper tantrum” signaled the start of the end of the bond bull run making fixed income riskier and reducing the likelihood of 8% annual returns going forward. Given this change in risk/return characteristics within the fixed income area, the same risk tolerances score from prior years may not necessary lead to the same asset allocation mix. Hence, many DWM clients reduced their allocation to fixed income in 2013, some quite significantly.

At the same time, DWM fixed income holdings were re-positioned in an effort to reduce risk and potentially increase returns for an expected rising interest rate environment:

  • Reduced duration (when interest rates rise, bond with the longest maturities suffer the greatest drop in price)
  • Added international developed and emerging exposure
  • Added floating rate exposure with very low duration and ability to perform in rising markets
  • Continued diversification through low cost vehicles
  • Kept credit quality solid

So, with all the uncertainty regarding when, how high, and how often the Fed raises rates and how the markets will react to these changes, we suggest you focus on what you can control. If you haven’t already done so, now is a great time to review your asset allocation and your investment holdings. Our DWM clients know that is one of the highlights of our meetings with them, hopefully quarterly or even more often when appropriate. For others, we’re happy to help provide a second opinion. Just give us a call.

Time for a Stock Market Correction?

bullsvsbearThe overall calm, positive performance of financial markets in 2014 took a hit on July 31st when stocks declined 2-3% and fixed income and alternatives lost about 1%. Markets have been about flat since then, yet talk about a stock market correction of 10% or more has escalated.

There’s lots of reasons why some believe a correction could happen:

  • Valuations of stocks are high. The current P/E ratio of the S&P 500 is 15.7- higher than the 10-year average of 14.1
  • Improving U.S. economic conditions have brought concerns about the Fed raising rates quicker than many investors anticipated
  • Europe’s prolonged economic slump is making deflation a concern
  • Economic sanctions against Russia could negatively impact consumer demand in many countries
  • Geopolitical unrest in Iraq, Gaza, Syria, Ukraine, etc. could explode

Yet, at the same time, there are many reasons why some believe the bull market should continue:

  • The U.S. economy is the best in years: new jobs are up, unemployment is at 6.1%, job openings are at a seven-year high, housing is up again after a slow start in 2014, car sales are at post-crisis high, and consumer sentiment is up
  • There has been a huge recovery in American corporate revenue and profits since the 2008-2009 crisis. Yes, lower borrowing costs helped. Second quarter earnings, with nearly 90% of S&P 500 companies having reported, are on track to grow 8.4% this year
  • For a variety of reasons, companies are continuing to buy back large quantities of stock
  • Market peaks have occurred historically when P/E ratios are 25 times earnings or more
  • Geopolitical worries have boosted the allure of “safe” bonds. With U.S. 10-yr bonds at 2.4% and German 10-yr bonds at 1%, stocks continue to be very attractive

Overall, it has been suggested that we are in a “Goldilocks” economy. One that is “not too hot, not too cold.” Stimulative policies, created by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and now Janet Yellen have created a great environment for stock growth. However, when investors get nervous about the Fed’s ability to keep the “temperature just right” we have seen big swings. May and June 2013 saw 5-6% drops when the Fed first started talking about “tapering” the QE program. Now, with the economy doing better and inflation nearing 2% targets, investors are concerned that the Fed will start to raise interest rates and change our “just right” conditions. That’s a huge challenge for the Fed. A perceived major misstep or miscommunication by the Fed could again shake the markets.

Yes, at some point we will have a correction in the stock market. History tells us they come along regularly (27 corrections of 10% or more since 1945). Yet, a priori, the reasons were enigmatic. Hence, trying to time the start and finish of such events is useless.

We have a saying at DWM: “There are many variables you cannot control. Long-term success, on the other hand, relies on managing the variables you can control, including reviewing your risk profile and asset allocation, reducing expenses, diversifying portfolios, minimizing taxes, and staying invested.”

What’s Next for the Economy and Markets?

crystal-ballTough question. A more relevant question would be: “How do I obtain long-term investment success?” We’ll discuss both today.

First, the economy and the markets are not correlated over the short-term. Last week’s overall market selloff again demonstrates this. Yes, over the long-run, there is a correlation between GDP growth and corporate earnings. But data demonstrates that over the short-term, there is no correlation.

Second, it is imperative to filter the noise of the media and put the current situation in broader context, than to guess about the future. Our economy is still recovering from the 2008 credit crisis. Similar crises were followed by weak GDP and job growth. The Fed confirmed last week that we are following this historical pattern. Since September 2012, when the latest QE program started, the unemployment rate has fallen from 7.8% to 7.6%. The Fed expects GDP to increase 2.3-2.6% this year. Inflation is up only 1.05% year over year.

Of course, these results, and the stock markets, have been influenced by easy money policies. Since 2008, the fed funds rate has been near zero. Hence, the Fed has employed additional policies to boost the economy. The most significant has been QE. The Economist on Friday described Chairman Bernanke’s tough assignment: “In a zero-interest rate environment, the central bank can influence monetary conditions more through words than through actions.” Mr. Bernanke’s comments last week, which pointed to the path that actions were “data dependent” were interpreted (perhaps incorrectly) by many investors to mean greater “hawkishness” (tapering was about to start). Virtually all markets tumbled.

The economic data doesn’t support a change in the bond-buying policy. Unemployment is still at 7.6%, labor participation rates are near 29 year lows, inflation expectation are falling, and perhaps, most importantly, there has been no substantial improvement in job growth:

chart

Yet, despite the weak pace of overall growth, the recovery in the last four years seems to be getting smoother. The housing market is up, the energy sector is booming, auto sales are improving, household finances are looking healthier and consumer confidence is at a five-year high. The Fed has increased its 2014 growth forecasts to 3% to 3.5%, from a March forecast of 2.9% to 3.4%. So, we’re making progress, but will it continue? And, if so, when will tapering start?

We agree with Yogi Berra, who said: “It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future.” We humans are not so good with making accurate predictions. However, these days, you can generally find an opinion to confirm almost any point of view. In fact, studies have shown that the most confident, specific forecasts are a) most likely believed by readers and viewers, and b) least likely to be correct.

We prefer to focus on the long-term. People seem to lose sight of their financial future in the midst of all the noise. Most of us have a long-term investment horizon- perhaps 20, 30 years or more. During that time, we can expect bull and bear markets, volatility and short-term market swings. Emotional reactions to short-term events and media noise can cause you to miss market rallies and doom you to long-term investment failure.

You need a disciplined investment strategy and perhaps a full-time professional investment adviser to help you with it. Your asset allocation needs to represent the three asset classes; stocks, bonds and alternatives, with further diversification within each asset class. Your portfolio needs to be reviewed continually and rebalanced regularly. You need to make your capital work for you all the time, and not leave money sitting in cash. Over time, asset allocation, diversification, rebalancing and mean reversion will all work in your favor.

So, we won’t focus on predictions. Instead, what we will do is to help you establish and maintain a long-term probability-based investment approach that should reap dividends and investment success for you for years to come. Give us a call. We’d be happy to chat.

The Underwater Beach Ball Effect

beach ball underwaterRemember as a kid holding a beach ball underwater, then letting it go? It’s fun. It’s also quite unpredictable as it returns to equilibrium.

The Federal Reserve is now facing the same task with long-term interest rates. Rates have been artificially submerged since the financial crisis in 2008. Can the Fed curtail their unprecedented monetary stimulus program without major fallouts to the economy and the financial markets?

On May 22nd, Chairman Bernanke told a congressional panel that he did not foresee an immediate reduction to easy money. However, hours later, the minutes from the last Fed meeting were released. These showed a growing number of governors want to start to “taper off” as early as next month. The markets have been rattled since then. The concern is: can the Fed “taper” off the quantitative easing without damage? It would be quite a balancing act. And, we, of course, are in uncharted waters.

Things had been going swimmingly since last September. The Fed has been buying $85 billion in bonds every month, lowering the long-term interest rates and boosting economic growth. The strategy appears to be working. The economy is growing, unemployment is shrinking, the housing market is recovering and the stock market has been soaring. The Fed had promised to keep the program going until there was a “substantial improvement” in the job market. We’re getting close. However, the markets have been spooked for the last seven trading days.

On Friday, U.S. Treasuries posted their biggest losses in more than two years, pushing yields to twelve month highs. The 30-year mortgage rate rose to 3.81% nationwide. Fixed income investments of all types declined in value, particularly currencies and emerging markets.

The S&P 500 has been down over 2% since May 22 and other equity subclasses, such as international, small cap and emerging markets are down even more. Many of the liquid alternative holdings have been flat, however, global real estate is down significantly, and gold is up in the last seven trading days. It’s one of those short periods of time when almost every investment is down.

The good news is that the economy has in fact recovered sufficiently that the Fed is considering tapering off easy money. That’s great. However, at this stage, we have no idea of the timing or the results of tapering. Bond interest and stock prices are connected, though not in a simple way. If bond interest rates rise too rapidly or too high, they will raise the cost of credit for companies and stock prices will be hurt. However, if interest rates are able to return to, let’s say, 5% or 6% that might have little impact on stocks.

focus

So what’s an investor to do? Should you do something or nothing? During periods of stress and volatility we suggest you focus on what you can control and learn to roll with what is out of your control. For example, none of us can control what the Fed does, what the major media report as front page news, interest rates or market actions. What we can control is our long – term investing plan, our asset allocation and the wealth manager we use.

It’s especially important at these times to review your long-term financial goals, risk profile (risk tolerance, risk capacity, and risk perception) and asset allocation. Most portfolios need a diversified mix of stocks, bonds and alternative investments. And, they need an experienced, proactive, trusted wealth manager like DWM, who has protected and grown client assets through volatile periods, just like the one we may be encountering now. Give us a call.

Quantitative Easing: QE 4ever?

QE (2)We are all in the midst of one of the biggest global financial experiments ever conducted: Quantitative Easing. Since the world financial crisis in late 2008, the Fed and other central banks have employed this technique in an effort to stimulate the world economy. QE has certainly has had an impact. It has reduced home mortgage rates to all-time lows and helped push the stock markets to all-time highs. Yet, QE is not an elixir. QE can’t cure all the ills of a moribund world economy. Furthermore, QE could ultimately cause major damage to the U.S. and world economy.

Last week, a good friend and client suggested that an update on QE might be appropriate for our readers. Good idea DD; thanks for the suggestion.

Quantitative Easing is an unconventional monetary policy used by central banks to stimulate the economy when conventional monetary policy isn’t working. Historically, the Fed has principally stimulated the economy by lowering short-term (fed funds) rates and cooled down the economy by raising short-term rates. However, by late 2008, the Fed funds rate was as low as it could go-effectively at zero. The Fed needed another tool. QE, last used in the U.S. from 1932-1936, got the call.

QE has the same effect as printing money. The central bank buys treasury and agency bonds from commercial banks and other private institutions (using electronic transfers), thereby creating money and liquidity. The purchases raise bond prices and reduce their yields, thereby reducing long-term interest rates. Interest rates on 10 yr. U.S. Treasuries have fallen from roughly 3% to 2% since QE started. Lower treasury rates mean lower home mortgage rates, which has certainly helped the housing industry get back on its feet.

Many investors, uncomfortable with lower returns on fixed income, started loading up on stocks and riskier debt. Since the start of QE, there has been an 85% direct correlation between the amounts of money added to QE and the rise in the stock markets. During 1Q2013, the move to riskier assets intensified. The result -stocks hitting all-time highs. Furthermore, increasing stock values have been shown to affect both consumption and investment decisions, which helps the economy as well.

Other developed countries have also adopted QE to stimulate their economies. The UK started in 2009. The European Union started in 2011. And Japan, which used QE in 2001-2006, started a new round of QE last year. In total, about $10 trillion has been invested by central banks world-wide in QE programs.

There are two major concerns with QE. First, many believe that QE will ultimately cause inflation-perhaps hyperinflation. With the money supply expanding faster than the real economy, one would expect inflation to occur. This hasn’t happened yet. Fortunately, the U.S. dollar continues to be the world’s reserve currency. Hence, events in Cyprus and other parts of Europe cause investors to dump the euro for dollars. Certainly if China and/or Saudi Arabia would ever drop the dollar or dump U.S. Treasuries, we could certainly see a run on the dollar and perhaps hyperinflation. However, that scenario, if it does occur, is likely years or decades away.

The second concern of QE is the impact when it starts to unwind. At their FOMC meeting in March, the Fed signaled that it would keep its ultra-easy money policy for now. They will continue this at least as long as the unemployment rate is above 6 ½%. As it approaches this level, it is expected the Fed will taper off QE. However, Chairman Bernanke made it clear that the Fed would discontinue QE long before it would raise the fed-funds rate. And it promised to keep the fed-funds rate at current levels until 2015.

So, the net effect is that once there is a substantial improvement in the economy, QE will stop. This will likely result in higher interest rates and higher inflation- both of which could slow economic growth. As a result, some are calling for the Fed to start unwinding QE now. With the unrest in Europe and around the world currently, perhaps the impact of unwinding of QE now would be less damaging to the U.S. economy than it will be in the future.

Rest assured, DWM is following QE very carefully. This experiment has already had a huge impact on the U.S. and world economy and undoubtedly will for years to come.