Charlie Capasso’s interview on SC Business Review with host Mike Switzer.
The Olympics open in London on Wednesday, July 27th. You won’t see any sponsor logos on the athletes or in the stadium. Similarly, in ancient Greece there we no logos on clothing either. Of course, back then, the competitors were naked.
Even so, the Olympics today are big business.
Eleven global companies have paid almost $1 billion for their four year commitment (2009-2012) as a top Olympic partner (“TOP”). There is only one TOP sponsor for each commercial category. Coca-Cola for soft drinks, Visa for credit cards, McDonald’s for fast food and so on. Unable to advertise inside, the sponsors must advertise outside, by way of posters and packaging and every other platform available. So every sponsor links their advertising back to the Olympics. The International Olympic Committee (“IOC”) has made a policy against “crass commercialism” and the result is worldwide advertising by the TOPs of the upcoming Olympics. What a fantastic deal for the IOC. And, it must be working for the TOPs as well- many have been doing this for 25 years or more years and fees are up 10.5% in this quadrennium.
The IOC has raised almost $5 billion in sponsorship and broadcasting rights for 2010 Vancouver and 2012 London. Broadcasters have paid $3.9 billion for television rights. NBC Universal has paid $1.2 billion for the rights to the London games. According to the Economist, to date, NBC has sold $950 million in advertising and will undoubtedly sell more ads at the last minute. Add in the cost of cameras, computers, and communication and they are expected lose $200 million. Not to worry. NBC will be paying $4.4 billion for the games from 2014 to 2020. NBC’s plan is to make big inroads on ESPN. Of course, they will be fighting time zone differences and many Olympic sports that don’t interest Americans. However, there will be 3,500 hours of coverage, many online, this year. Get your smart phones ready.
Lastly, London will invest almost $15 billion to be the host. They’ve invested heavily in a new Olympic Park, a grand Velodrome and a new $400 million aquatic center. They’ve built roads and spent billions on revamping and revitalizing parts of East London. David Cameron, Britain’s prime minister, has promised a return of $20 billion. If he is right, it will be a rarity for most modern day Olympics hosts. However, Britain, alone among recent hosts, has focused on “legacy.” The Olympic Stadium will hold 80,000 during the games but will be dismantled afterward to hold 25,000. Many sites are temporary venues that can be dismantled and reused afterwards. It’s a tough time. The British economy is currently in a recession and Cameron hopes that the Olympics will boost GDP by .2% in the third quarter. London has had the wettest summer in recent history. The hoped-for tourist boom doesn’t seem to be happening. Finally, due to the congestion, London employers have been encouraged to send their employees home for two weeks and work from home. Ultimately, there may little impact on the UK’s GDP, but at least London employees can spend some time on the couch watching their telly.
Let’s first take a look at job growth since the end of the recession, July 2009. Since that time, according to Federal Reserve Economic Data, 2.6 million net new jobs have been created in the private sector. Small companies (those with fewer than 50 employees) have added 1.3 million new jobs. Mid-size companies (those with 51-500) have added 1.4 million new jobs. Big businesses (those more than 500) have cut payrolls by 100,000 people.
The U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) also knows how important small businesses are. They tell us that businesses with fewer than 500 people represent 99.7% of all employer units and about ½ of all private sector employees. In addition small and mid-size businesses have generated 60 to 80% of net new jobs annually over the last decade and have created more than half of non-farm private GDP. Ronald Reagan knew this. Back in 1981 he said “Let us not overlook the fact that the small, independent business man or woman creates more than 80 percent of all new jobs and employs more than half of our total work force.”
Just last week, the L.A. Times ran an article by John Bunzel suggesting that we need to “nurture the real job creators-big business.” His article, along with others we have seen recently, would like to have us believe that, according to Mr. Bunzel, “big business remains the primary driver of economic growth and job creation.” The facts, as outlined above, just don’t support that conclusion.
If there is any nurturing to be provided, let’s give it to the real job creators in our country- small and mid-size businesses. Kudos to them!
After the investor party that took place in the 1st quarter, 2q12 started like a bad hangover with most stock indices getting hit hard in May. Fortunately the best month of June (at least for the S&P500) since 1999 helped recoup some of the early losses.
For the record, the average US diversified stock fund posted a -4.6% return for the second quarter yet remains up 7% so far this year! That’s pretty amazing given the soft economic conditions here in the U.S. and the turmoil overseas. And speaking of overseas, the international markets continued to lag the domestic markets in the second quarter as evidenced by diversified international stock funds dropping 7.1%, yet still up 3.8% Year-To-Date (“YTD”). It should be noted that international outperformed domestic in the month of June, a trend we expect to continue. Another note was value outperformed growth in 2Q12.
With stocks trending down most of the quarter, investors gravitated to safety as expressed by the relatively strong showing in the bond world. The Barclays Capt’l US Aggregate Bond Index was up 2.1% for the quarter and now up 2.4% YTD. Yields on 10-year Treasury notes fell to 1.5% last week, near the lowest levels in generations, reflecting market dreariness about the economy and also possibly the anticipation of more action by the Fed.
Turning toward alternatives, our DWM Liquid Alternatives portfolio did its primary job of protecting first, participating-in-upside second, up almost 1% for the quarter and now up almost 5% on the year. During the quarter, we successfully merged in alts like real estate, gold, and other commodities that were held in strategic models into the LA portfolios for more-focused strategy tracking moving forward.
Going forward, there are many challenges: 5 of 17 Eurozone countries have received a financial bailout in the last 2½ years with more on the horizon. Let’s face it, its not just the PIGS (Portugal,Ireland,Greece, and Spain) that we need to worry about; the whole Eurozone faces recession. Move Far East, and even China is slowing down. Back in the homeland, our latest readings show slowing new orders, production, etc. Three years after the end of the nation’s most recent recession, the U.S.employs almost 4 million fewer Americans than when the recession began and 12.7 million people remain jobless. And the worst is that Joe Consumer is not spending as much as he did just last year. In the political arena, we are now in the Presidential Election wait-game with not much getting done in Washington D.C.before that wraps up. And frankly there’s a lot that needs attention politically… Did you know that Federal spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid has risen from 16% of total government spending in 1967 to 41% of spending in 2011 and the percentage is only going to go higher unless serious changes are made?
The good news is that almost all of the major global central banks are taking steps to bolster economic output. U.S. Fed Head Bernanke said last month “We are prepared to do what’s necessary”. We think they’ll keep this attitude for the near future and hence don’t anticipate rates/inflation moving up any time soon. This should create an environment where stocks are volatile, bonds have modest returns, and alternatives are the key driver in your portfolio’s total return.
In conclusion, here are a few more general comments on the stock market. Of course, stocks (equities) only represent a minority allocation for our clients’ portfolios. Diversification amongst stocks, bonds, and alternatives is the key to achieving a stable, long-term return. But equity is the asset class that gets the most headlines. So I thought it would be fun to remind people that as gloomy as the stock market may seem, the S&P500 is now entering its 41st month in the current bull market and has gained 115% (total return) since bottoming 3/09/09. Here’s another tidbit: The average bull market for the S&P500 since 1950 has lasted 58 months. It’ll be fun to see if this current run, even though it may not feel like one, can eclipse the average. As a reminder, if you haven’t already done so, please download the DWM Mobile App to your smartphone so you can see your portfolio at any time and take advantage of the many features within. Enjoy your summer and we hope to connect with you again soon!
On June 28, the Supreme Court affirmed Obamacare. Numerous tax changes were included in the law. Some have already gone into effect and others are scheduled to kick in over the next several years. A new 3.8% surtax on investment income will start on January 1, 2013. Capital gains rates will increase from 15% to 18.8%. And, if Congress allows the Bush tax cuts to expire, the top rate would be 23.8% on capital gains and 43.4% on dividends.
Advisers and investors are now looking at ways to accelerate income into 2012 and considering other long-term strategies, such as converting a regular IRA into a Roth IRA.
Regular IRAs have been characterized as “deals with the devil” that taxpayers make with the IRS. Money invested is not taxed when contributed but later, after the amounts have grown over the years, and then the tax is based on the full amount of the IRA, including earnings, at the then current tax rates.
With a conversion to a Roth, a taxpayer ends the “arrangement.” Taxes are paid on amounts not previously taxed. The taxpayer can continue to grow the Roth account from that point without tax and pay no tax at the time of distribution(s). Furthermore, the taxpayer and their spouse are not required to take regular minimum distributions starting at age 70 ½ as are required for traditional IRAs. Hence, a Roth account could grow tax free for decades without tax and could continue to grow tax-free during the beneficiaries’ lifetimes as well, though annual distributions are required once mom and dad die.
So, the question is, does it make sense to convert now, based on new taxes going into effect in 2013 and the likelihood that income taxes will increase in coming years? And, if so, when should the conversion be done? Here are a few rules of thumb:
Check with your CPA before you make your final decision. If you do decide to convert, you may want to convert over time, perhaps 5-10 years, so that the income produced by the conversion doesn’t push you into a higher tax bracket. The special conversion election in 2010 to split the income and report it in 2011 and 2012 no longer applies. However, conversion still is available regardless of the income of the taxpayer(s).
Everyone at DWM hopes you and yours have a happy and safe Fourth of July. In honor of our national holiday and courtesy of National Geographic, we’d like to share six memorable myths that turn out to be more fiction that fact.
1) Did Paul Revere ride solo? No, he didn’t. Yes, patriot Paul Revere really did ride the night of April 18, 1775 to warn the countryside that the British troops were on the move. He and two other riders, William Dawes and Samuel Prescott were, in fact, part of a highly effective, early warning system. Longfellow’s 1860 poem “Paul Revere’s Ride” fails to acknowledge the other two riders or that all three were, in fact, captured that night by the British.
2) Did a raucous Independence Day Party in Philly crack the Liberty Bell? No, the State House bell cracked soon after its arrival in 1752. The bell was recast and recracked several times but was intact during the Revolutionary War.
3) Did patriots flock to fight for freedom? Not really. There was a surge of initial enlistees. However, as it became clear that the struggle for independence would be long and difficult, the enthusiasm began to wane. Many colonies resorted to cash incentives as early as 1776 and states were drafting men by 1778.
4) Did John Adams die thinking of Thomas Jefferson? Incredibly both Adams and Jefferson died on the same day, July 4, 1826, exactly fifty years after the founding of America. However, Jefferson actually died a few hours before Adams and there is no evidence that supports the myth that Adams whispered these final words: “Thomas Jefferson survives.”
5) Did Betsy Ross Make the First American Flag? There is no proof that Betsy Ross played any part in designing or sewing the American flag that made its debut in 1777. Her participation was only revealed nearly a century after the fact by her grandson. There is no evidence, on the other hand, to prove she was not the seamstress.
6) Does the Declaration of Independence hold secret messages? The movie National Treasure was based upon a “coded map” on the back of the Declaration of Independence which would lead to the lost “national treasure” of precious metals, artwork and other artifacts accumulated over many millennia. Of course, that is not true. The National Archives acknowledges that there is something written on the back of the document. It is merely a label stating: “Original Declaration of Independence dated 4th July 1776.”
From the Charleston Mercury June 29:
Happy Carolina Day. Two hundred thirty six years ago patriots defeated the British at Sullivan’s Island. Today, Americans and Europeans are fighting another war – against debt and slowing ecomomic growth. Click here to read the full article.
On June 28th, Americans anxiously awaited as the Supreme Court ruled on Obama Care. In Europe, a week earlier, all eyes were on the European Court of Justice. Their case did not concern health care; rather it concerned vacation time, a topic near and dear to Europeans.
The European Court of Justice ruled last week that workers are entitled to additional paid vacation time if they don’t feel well during their original vacation. Amazing.
The question had originated in Spain, where trade unions sued for the vacation do-over allowance some years ago. The European court upheld the right throughout the EU, stating that “the entitlement to paid annual leave must be regarded as a particularly important principle of EU social law; a principle enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, and thus cannot be interpreted restrictively.”
Vacation do-overs add to the EU minimum of 20 paid days of vacation per year and this doesn’t include national holidays, EU mandated weekends, breaks and other additional time off. It’s even better in countries like France, where the minimum is 25 paid days per year and you get an extra 10 paid days if you work a 39 hour week instead of a 35 hour week. In addition, Europeans accrue vacation time while they are on sick leave. Hence, they could end a long recuperation period by going on paid vacation.
The EU Court decision comes at a time when the rate of unemployment in Spain is 25% and Europe is in the midst of an economic crisis. Perhaps the leaders of Europe need to take a look at the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Seems some changes might be needed there if Europe ever hopes to return to strong economic growth in the future.
In January, a Big Mac cost $6.81 in Switzerland, $4.20 in the U.S., $2.44 in China, and $1.96 in India. The hourly wage at a McDonald’s (“McWages”) in each of those countries was $15.00, $9.24, $1.46 and 78 cents, respectively. Economists divide the cost of the Big Mac by the McWage to get “Big Macs per Hour” or BMPH in comparing countries. In the U.S., Canada and Western Europe, our BMPH is 2.2 (hourly earnings at a McDonald’s are 2.2 times the cost of Big Mac). In China the BMPH is .6 and in India only .4. So, in India, McDonald workers would have to work 2 ½ hours just to be able to buy a Maharaja Mac (made of chicken, not beef.) These numbers change over time and that’s what the economists are tracking.
The Big Mac Index was started in 1986 to attempt to track “purchasing power parity (“PPP”)” used to evaluate market exchange rates, currency valuations and cost of living changes across the globe. Mc Wages and Big Macs were selected because they are uniform and ubiquitous. Sandwiches are produced worldwide according to a rigidly uniform process detailed in a 600 page manual. Identical burgers are produced in every city. This produces an ideal environment for global productivity comparisons. BMPH represents a PPP-like calculation of the real wage, taking account the local cost of goods.
The Big Mac Index demonstrates the vast gulfs in worldwide productivity and standards of living. The gaps are in fact shrinking. In the U.S., our BMPH was 2.4 in 2007. Now, the McWage is up 26% in four years, but the cost of the Big Mac is up 38%, partially due to increases in food prices. The net 9% drop in our BMPH is one sign of a reduced overall standard of living. In Russia, the BMPH increased an astounding 152% from 2000 to 2007 and has increased another 42% from 2007 to 2011. China has had increases of 60% from 2000 to 2007 and another 22% from 2007 to 2011. India saw a large increase of 53% from 2000 to 2007 but their BMPH declined by 10% from 2007 to 2011. It’s no surprise that more progress in standards of living was made by the BRICs and other developing countries from 2000 to 2007 than from 2007 to 2011.
Yes, our BMPH has gone down slightly here in the U.S. over the last decade. Even so, we’re still the envy of the entire world, by far. Time to celebrate- with a Big Mac and fries.
Investors like hedge-fund strategies to manage portfolio risk. What they don’t like are the fees, lack of transparency, illiquidity, high minimums and lockup periods of hedge funds. Enter liquid alternative (“LA”) mutual funds. Assets in LA funds have grown three-fold in the last four years, while hedge fund assets have declined by 40%.
The Morningstar and Barron’s Alternative Investment Survey of U.S. Institutions and Financial Advisors identifies trends in alternative investing. Responses this year, as reported by Barron’s on May 26, 2012, show that “advisers are increasingly using mutual funds to get at alternative strategies and asset classes.” The report continued, “Investors are increasingly interested in anything not correlated with the stock and bond markets.These (LA) vehicles are viewed as a way to deliver additional, or even outsize, returns over conventional investment strategies.”
Barron’s report is no surprise to us. DWM was one of the early adopters of LA fund strategies. Back in early 2008, we encouraged clients to consider reducing their exposure to equities and substituting non-correlated, liquid alternatives. Many of these LAs held their ground in 2008 while equity funds suffered losses of 30% or more. We felt then as we do now- a traditional portfolio of stocks and bonds is not the answer alone. If your first goal is to protect your assets and the second to grow them, we suggest incorporating an appropriate mix of non-correlated LA investments to your portfolio.
The picture above represents a possible allocation for the DWM LA basket. It was established for the investor seeking less volatility and more absolute-type returns than the equity market. Holdings may include arbitrage funds, global tactical allocation funds, and market-neutral funds, among others. The model follows a “low beta” approach. Low beta means returns that have little correlation to market risk and results. That being said, when there is a bull market, the performance of the model will most likely not be as great as a 100% stock portfolio. However, in a bear market, the model is geared to protect the downside.
The funds within the DWM LA portfolio are chosen to complement one another and together create a very powerful portfolio that can potentially excel in any market environment. We constantly monitor this dynamic LA area for offerings that may represent new opportunities for the DWM LA model and its investors.
Welcome aboard, Barron’s. It’s great to see a major, traditional investment publication recognizing the growth, value and importance of liquid alternatives.